Portfolio.25

Overview

.01 - What

Lead component design and developer collaboration for Advisor360's first comprehensive design system, unifying visual language and interaction patterns across a suite of enterprise wealth management tools.

.02 - How

Conducted comprehensive UI audits across product areas, designed molecule/organism-level components, established documentation standards, and facilitated weekly design syncs to ensure system adoption and technical feasibility.

.03 - Why

The existing platform had evolved organically with inconsistent patterns across Compliance, Trading, and Insurance modules. Teams were rebuilding similar components repeatedly, QA cycles were extended by visual inconsistencies, and feature development was slowed by decision paralysis.

Results

Reduction in custom component requests. Improved developer handoff efficiency.

Process

Design Approach

Conducted comprehensive UI audits across Compliance, Trading, and Insurance modules documenting existing patterns and identifying consolidation opportunities.
Held weekly design syncs with design team ensuring component structure alignment and behavior consistency across all system modules.
Designed mid-level components including data tables, form patterns, and navigation structures leveraging PrimeNG technical constraints and capabilities.
Established documentation standards moving from Figma-based specs to Confluence repository including behavior states and technical implementation requirements.

Developer Handoff + Collaboration

Technical feasibility was validated early through regular collaboration with engineering teams ensuring component designs aligned with PrimeNG library capabilities and performance requirements.
Documentation migration to Confluence improved developer access to implementation specs, behavior guidelines, and usage examples reducing back-and-forth communication.
Component logic and structure were continuously refined based on real-world implementation challenges and edge cases discovered during development cycles.
Cross-functional feedback loops incorporated input from developers, product managers, and stakeholders throughout component creation and system evolution.

System Evolution & Adoption

Living system approach treated the design system as an evolving product rather than static deliverable, allowing for component restructuring based on emerging requirements.
Stakeholder visibility improved through Confluence enabling C-suite leadership to understand business value.
Component iteration cycles addressed edge cases and technical limitations discovered during implementation ensuring system remained practical and adoptable

Results

Impact

Note: Long-term adoption metrics were not captured due to company restructuring during project timeline.

Reduced developer questions during handoff from multiple clarification calls per component to documented specifications accessible in Confluence, streamlining implementation cycles.
Decreased custom component development as teams began leveraging documented library patterns instead of building one-off solutions for similar use cases.
Improved stakeholder visibility with system progress trackable through Confluence documentation, enabling leadership to understand design system business value and adoption status.

This work deepened my understanding of system design — not just building reusable UI, but balancing decisions between design intent, dev feasibility, and user need. It also reminded me where I thrive: Translating design into action. Building structure out of complexity. Thinking beyond pixels.

‍

Systems That Scale: Enterprise Design System Adoption

Overview

.01 - What

.02 - How

.03 - Why

Results

Process

Design Approach

Developer Handoff + Collaboration

System Evolution & Adoption

Results

Impact

Designs

Ready to push your product forward?

LET'S GET STARTED